Bristol, TN Weighs Banning Roosters Within City Limits

The City of Bristol, Tennessee, is considering a significant change that could impact local pet owners and residents alike. Following several noise complaints from community members, the Bristol City Council is now looking at prohibiting the keeping of roosters within the city limits. The issue was brought to light during a recent work session where this amendment was introduced.

Major Walter Brown from the Bristol Tennessee Police Department presented the draft ordinance amendment to the council. “Our community development and the police department have received numerous complaints about the noise roosters make,” said Brown. “Upon further investigation, we found that other nearby cities have similar bans in place.” It turns out that Bristol, Virginia and Johnson City already have regulations prohibiting roosters, while Kingsport allows only one rooster per five acres of land.

The proposed ordinance isn’t just limited to roosters; it would also ban peacocks and guinea fowls within the city limits if passed. “This proposal will need to go through the City Council for two readings,” explained Brown, “which gives the public a chance to speak for or against it.”

If the changes are approved, they won’t go into effect immediately. The police department and community development team plan to recommend an effective date of March 2025. “This will give ample time for announcements to be made and for residents to find new homes for their roosters,” Brown noted.

Currently, the proposed ordinance includes a provision for property owners with 50 acres or more within the city to keep roosters, although Brown mentioned that no such properties exist at the moment. “Given the close proximity of homes in the city, we think it’s better not to have any roosters at all,” he said.

Interestingly, this potential ban does not affect hens. Residents will still be allowed to keep hens within the city limits, which could be a relief for those who enjoy raising chickens for eggs. The focus of the new rule is solely on roosters and a few other loud birds that have been causing disturbances.

The move to ban roosters has sparked a variety of reactions among residents. Some, like long-time resident Sarah Miller, think it’s a necessary step. “Roosters are noisy and disruptive, especially early in the morning,” said Miller. “My family and I have been woken up countless times.” On the other hand, others like local farmer John Peterson, who keeps a small flock of chickens, worry about the ordinance’s impact. “Roosters are crucial for the natural lifecycle of chickens,” he said. “This move could make it harder for people like me who rely on small-scale farming.”

The argument extends beyond Bristol, reflecting a growing trend in urban and suburban areas to manage conflicts between traditional farming practices and modern living conditions. Cities across the nation have been struggling with similar issues, often balancing community complaints with the benefits of urban agriculture.

With the first reading expected soon, the community is gearing up for a series of public discussions. Council members hope these sessions will provide a platform for all voices to be heard. “It’s crucial we consider the perspectives of everyone involved—those bothered by the noise and those who keep roosters responsibly,” added Brown.

For now, residents are encouraged to stay informed and participate in the upcoming meetings. Flyers and announcements will be made to ensure the community is aware of the exact dates and times. As major decisions loom, Bristol’s approach to managing its animal population may set a precedent for similar-sized cities grappling with the clash of rural traditions and urban lifestyles.

Whether you’re pro-ban or against it, one thing is for sure: this lively debate will shape Bristol’s community guidelines for years to come. So, residents, stay tuned and make your voice heard!